linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: Update comments some more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZRVDWtcltu+QUW4+@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:11:54 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: Update comments some more


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> > + * infrastructure actually relies on the tick itself as a backend in
> > + * low-resolution mode (see hrtimer_run_queues()).
> > + *
> > + * This low-resolution handler still makes use of some hrtimer APIs meanwhile
> > + * for commodity with expiration calculation and forwarding.
> 
> commodity?

I presume 'commonality' was intended here?

Thanks,

	Ingo