[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRVG8jSgjJ7pR9b/@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:27:14 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/kmemleak: fix print format of pointer in
pr_debug()
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:59:23AM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote:
> With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead.
> And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate
> prefixes, which looks like:
>
> kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____))
> kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000)
>
> Use %pa instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer, and use 0x%px for
> __percpu pointer to prevent crash. Then the print will be like:
Why not %px in all cases?
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists