[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230928114733.GAZRVn1R4wvnS6AXIW@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:47:33 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 29/30] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision
check
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
> static struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops;
> static bool dis_ucode_ldr = true;
>
> +bool force_minrev = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_FORCE_MINREV);
> +module_param(force_minrev, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
Yeah, it's not a module anymore.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists