[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169601526974.3013632.14322525126930729466.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:21:07 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm raid: Annotate struct raid_set with __counted_by
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:03:36 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
>
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct raid_set.
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!
[1/1] dm raid: Annotate struct raid_set with __counted_by
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/588cd9b20862
Take care,
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists