[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZRc8L+fJAqHuWEg+@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:05:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] irqchip fixes for 6.6, take #1
* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:17 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > So the tags should be something like:
> >
> > Fixes: 397ad94668c1 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add pdc interrupt controller node")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905-topic-sm8x50-upstream-pdc-ver-v4-2-fc633c7df84b@linaro.org
> >
> > Ie. we generally sort the tags not chronologically (or whatever the original idea
> > was), but group them topically, sort the groups by importance, and only within
> > the group is there chronological order.
>
> The tags should represent the order of the hand-off chain:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.6-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L449
>
> and chronological history:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.6-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L493
That chronological requirement is only for the SOB chain itself.
To quote Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
Standard sign-off procedure applies, i.e. the ordering of Signed-off-by: tags should
reflect the chronological history of the patch insofar as possible,
which is exactly what I wrote above:
> > > only within the group is there chronological order.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In fact it would be crazy to require that all the tags are chronological,
in the random order they arrived, which the commits I pointed out appeared to be.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists