linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] iio: imu: Add driver for BMI323 IMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM+2EuJUGu4QUCdZ7d28RaLNipJRVuASP9wSzF14k=oBoC4e_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:29:13 +0530
From:   Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
To:     Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, lars@...afoo.de,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] iio: imu: Add driver for BMI323 IMU

Hi Denis,

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:55 AM Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Some devices (as my asus rog ally) have an ACPI node describing a BOSC0200 sensor. The IC being used in those devices is a  bmi323 but as a result of how the ACPI table reports that device, it is detected by the existing kernel module and we have no way of differentiating until after the chip ID probe.
>
> The module loaded is bmc150-accel-i2c.c which currently doesn't support the bmi323 and the loading of the module just fails at chip check.

bmc150 driver supports multiple accelerometer sensors such as
bma222, bma280, bmi055 and all of them are having similar
register map, but the bmi323 register map is completely different
from bmc150.


>
> I have solved the problem by expanding the current bmc150-accel-i2c.c and bmc150-accel-core.c files to handle that IC in almost every part: gyroscope, accelerometer and temperature sensor.
>
> What is the best way of organizing code to have this module mainlined? Is it correct leaving files called bmc150-accel-* even if it is managing another IC and and not just the accelerometer part anymore?
>
> TIA for your time.
>
> Best regards,
> Denis Benato

Regards

Jagath