| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:42:15 +0530
From: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490: Add qcm6490 dts file
On 9/28/2023 7:16 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 28.09.2023 15:33, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>> Add qcm6490 devicetree file for QCM6490 SoC and QCM6490 IDP
>> platform. QCM6490 is derived from SC7280 meant for various
>> form factor including IoT.
>>
>> Supported features are, as of now:
>> * Debug UART
>> * eMMC
>> * USB
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QCM6490 IDP platform";
> Isomething Development Platform platform?
Will drop suffix platform.
>
>> + compatible = "qcom,qcm6490-idp", "qcom,qcm6490";
>> +
>> + aliases {
>> + serial0 = &uart5;
>> + };
>> +
>> + chosen {
>> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> + };
>> +
>> +};
> Stray newline above
Noted.
>
>> +
>> +&apps_rsc {
>> + regulators-0 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm7325-rpmh-regulators";
>> + qcom,pmic-id = "b";
>> +
>> + vreg_s1b_1p8: smps1 {
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1856000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2040000>;
> Hm, you didn't specify regulator-initial-mode on any vregs
Okay, will specify it in next patchset.
>
> [...]
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "sc7280.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Delete sc7280 lpass related nodes as qcm6490 intends to move away from
>> + * bypass configuration
>> + */
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_ag_noc;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_aon;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_audiocc;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_core;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_cpu;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_hm;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_rx_macro;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_tx_macro;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_va_macro;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpass_tlmm;
>> +/delete-node/ &lpasscc;
>> +/delete-node/ &swr0;
>> +/delete-node/ &swr1;
> That's very unnecessary, most of these nodes are in use even
> when routing audio through ADSP.
>
> Ones that are not, are set to status = "reserved" and some
> will need more work to function based on the configuration.
>
> There was once a series from somebody at qc to introduce ADSP
> audio on 7280, but it was full of hacks and NAKed
Seeking clarification which nodes will be used and which should be disabled.
For now, will remove it.
>
>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Delete unused sc7280 memory nodes and define the memory regions
>> + * required by qcm6490
>> + */
> That's specific to your board.
No, these are not board specific, it's soc specific.
>
>> +/delete-node/ &rmtfs_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &wlan_ce_mem;
>> +
>> +/{
>> + reserved-memory {
>> + secdata_apss_mem: secdata-apss@...ff000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x808ff000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
> This is identical to the entry in sc7280.dtsi.
Yeah, right. Will remove it.
>
>> +
>> + cdsp_secure_heap_mem: cdsp-secure-heap@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x81800000 0x0 0x1e00000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + camera_mem: camera@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x84300000 0x0 0x500000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + adsp_mem: adsp@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x86100000 0x0 0x2800000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cdsp_mem: cdsp@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x88900000 0x0 0x1e00000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cvp_mem: cvp@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8ac00000 0x0 0x500000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + ipa_gsi_mem: ipa-gsi@...10000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8b110000 0x0 0xa000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gpu_microcode_mem: gpu-microcode@...1a000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8b11a000 0x0 0x2000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + mpss_mem: mpss@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8b800000 0x0 0xf600000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + wpss_mem: wpss@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x9ae00000 0x0 0x1900000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
> This entry is in both chrome-common and fairphone (meaning all boards
> use it), perhaps this one could be moved to 7280.dtsi
Missed to update region for wpss_mem. It's different what's used in
chrome-common and fairphone.
>
>> +
>> + tz_stat_mem: tz-stat@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0xc0000000 0x0 0x100000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + tags_mem: tags@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0xc0100000 0x0 0x1200000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + qtee_mem: qtee@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0xc1300000 0x0 0x500000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + trusted_apps_mem: trusted_apps@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0x0 0xc1800000 0x0 0x3900000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&hyp_mem {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x600000>;
> This is identical to the entry in sc7280.dtsi.
Will remove it.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mpss_mem {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8b800000 0x0 0xf600000>;
> You're defining it here and overwriting it with an identical
> value.
>
> Looks like CrOS folks don't boot up the modem on non-LTE SKUs.
> Weird. Normally it would host some more software..
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&remoteproc_mpss {
>> + memory-region = <&mpss_mem>;
> This is identical to the entry in sc7280.dtsi.
Will remove it.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&video_mem {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x8a700000 0x0 0x500000>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&wifi {
>> + memory-region = <&wlan_fw_mem>;
> No CE region?
Yes, no CE region is required here.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&wlan_fw_mem {
>> + reg = <0x0 0x80c00000 0x0 0xc00000>;
> This is identical to the entry in sc7280.dtsi.
Will remove it.
>
>
> The memory map generally looks quite different to both chrome
> and fairphone.. are you sure it's all correct?
Yes, it's correct, it's different than chrome and fairphone.
Thanks
Komal
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists