[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44fa4252-df03-41ae-928e-c13c69de12c4@leemhuis.info>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:24:08 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [czhong@...hat.com: [bug report] WARNING: CPU: 121 PID: 93233 at
fs/dcache.c:365 __dentry_kill+0x214/0x278]
On 17.09.23 02:35, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:59:31PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:
>> The issue still can be reproduced on the latest linux tree[2].
>> To reproduce I need to run about 1000 times blktests block/001, and
>> bisect shows it was introduced with commit[1], as it was not 100%
>> reproduced, not sure if it's the culprit?
>
> Anyway, thanks for bisecting this regression. I'm adding it to regzbot:
>
> #regzbot ^introduced: 9257959a6e5b4f
> #regzbot title: restructuring atomic locking conditionals causes vfs dentry lock protection failure
#regzbot fix: 6d2779ecaeb56f
#regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists