linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add Super-Speed UNIPHY in USB node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 19:01:30 +0530
From:   Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <peng.fan@....com>,
        <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, <quic_nsekar@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add Super-Speed UNIPHY in
 USB node



On 9/29/2023 6:44 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 29.09.2023 10:42, Praveenkumar I wrote:
>> Add UNIPHY node in USB to support Super-speed. As the SS PHY has
>> pipe clock, removed "qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk" flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
> Patches 6 and 7 should be swapped, otherwise you may get no
> USB with this commit. Incremental patches must not break
> functionality, unless it is truly inevitable.
Understood. Will swap the 6 and 7 patches in the update.

--
Thanks,
Praveenkumar
>
> Konrad