[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFhGd8rZLpfOhfmBChRTXsGkUjaCUMLiYzBcLbWE9xACK7SFwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:07:13 +0900
From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword matching
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:50 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 11:07 +0900, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:52 AM Nick Desaulniers
> > <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:09 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:31 +0900, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:01 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 04:23 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > > > - remove formatting pass (thanks Joe) (but seriously the formatting is
> > > > > > > bad, is there opportunity to get a formatting pass in here at some
> > > > > > > point?)
> > > > > >
>
> LG G7 Battery Replacement | Guide | Is it actually a Samsung? I t
> > > > > > Why? What is it that makes you believe the formatting is bad?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Investigating further, it looked especially bad in my editor. There is
> > > > > a mixture of
> > > > > tabs and spaces and my vim tabstop is set to 4 for pl files. Setting this to
> > > > > 8 is a whole lot better. But I still see some weird spacing
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it's a bit odd indentation.
> > > > It's emacs default perl format.
> > > > 4 space indent with 8 space tabs, maximal tab fill.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oh! What?! That's the most surprising convention I've ever heard of
> > > (after the GNU C coding style). Yet another thing to hold against
> > > perl I guess. :P
> > >
> > > I have my editor setup to highlight tabs vs spaces via visual cues, so
> > > that I don't mess up kernel coding style. (`git clang-format HEAD~`
> > > after a commit helps). scripts/get_maintainer.pl has some serious
> > > inconsistencies to the point where I'm not sure what it should or was
> > > meant to be. Now that you mention it, I see it, and it does seem
> > > consistent in that regard.
> > >
> > > Justin, is your formatter configurable to match that convention?
> > > Maybe it's still useful, as long as you configure it to stick to the
> > > pre-existing convention.
> >
> > Negative, all the perl formatters I've tried will convert everything to spaces.
> > The best I've seen is perltidy.
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/JustinStitt/347385921c80a5212c2672075aa769b6
>
> emacs with cperl mode works fine.
>
> I don't know much about vim, but when I open this file in vim
> it looks perfectly normal and it's apparently properly syntax
> highlighted.
>
I believe a :set tabstop=2 will make it look weird. But really,
this whole formatting thing is a non-issue for me personally
once I discovered what the problem was. I'm not sure this
file attracts nearly enough eyes to warrant an eager
formatting attempt as I was previously preaching for.
Nick and I using vim with special tab handling are most definitely
the exception and for most folks this file probably looks fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists