[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCjxW70h=rTNNiShEc8bmgwEaHpFnAHRB-m=ch47WdQsig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:33:17 +0200
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:14 PM Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> The Sub-NUMA cluster feature on some Intel processors partitions
> the CPUs that share an L3 cache into two or more sets. This plays
> havoc with the Resource Director Technology (RDT) monitoring features.
> Prior to this patch Intel has advised that SNC and RDT are incompatible.
>
> Some of these CPU support an MSR that can partition the RMID
> counters in the same way. This allows for monitoring features
> to be used (with the caveat that memory accesses between different
> SNC NUMA nodes may still not be counted accuratlely.
Is an "SNC NUMA node" a "sub-NUMA node", or a NUMA node on which SNC
has been enabled?
Thanks!
-Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists