linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Fix up icc clock rate calculation on some platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:13:56 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Fix up icc clock rate calculation on some
 platforms

On 25.08.2023 17:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Certain platforms require that some buses (or individual nodes) make
> some additional changes to the clock rate formula, throwing in some
> magic, Qualcomm-defined coefficients, to account for "inefficiencies".
> 
> Add the framework for it and utilize it on a couple SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
Georgi,

since this has been on the list for quite a while and there
haven't been major objections, could you please review and
queue them up?

Konrad