lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230929032743.6mjcyyx3cmjjxsix@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:57:43 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Cc:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        vschneid@...hat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Rebuild sched-domains when removing cpufreq
 driver

On 28-09-23, 14:49, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> Another solution would be to call sched_cpufreq_governor_change()
> from cpufreq_schedutil's init()/exit() callbacks. This would make
> more sense as EAS/schedutil cpufreq are tightly bound, and it would
> allow to cover all the possible paths.
> 
> When tried locally, it seems to cover all scenarios:
> - insmod/rmmod a cpufreq driver
> - changing the governor policy
> - offlining all the CPUs of a pd

Right now it is done for all governors. We don't need that ? We just care about
schedutil here ?

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ