linux-kernel - question regarding coding convention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <trinity-c4c6b25b-8372-453e-b5e5-5d4003282d7c-1696068689143@3c-app-mailcom-bs15>
Date:   Sat, 30 Sep 2023 12:11:29 +0200
From:   daggs <daggs@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: question regarding coding convention

Greetings,

I have a question regarding the kernel coding convention.
lets say I want to add a new arch named foo and there is a func named goo which all other archs are implementing but foo isn't.
what is the proper way to handle it? as the kernel code is quite big, I didn't found any example.

Thanks,

Dagg