[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28260226-f1ec-4404-a684-4ca89106ad05@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 16:45:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mani@...nel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, bvanassche@....org, avri.altman@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Align clk binding property
for Qualcomm UFS
On 29/09/2023 15:19, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Align the binding property for clock such that "clocks" property
> comes first followed by "clock-names" property.
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.
Thank you.
Since you also ignored tags or added them wrong, let's be clear here:
NAK till you solve all the issues.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists