[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175d9803-8ad7-4c70-ad8c-b2d661828b61@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:32:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com,
baruch@...s.co.il, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
nathan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
On 29/09/2023 10:56, Devi Priya wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..857086ad539e
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
>>>
>>> Filename matching compatible, so qcom,ipq6018-pwm.yaml
>> okay
> We would have other ipq compatibles (ipq9574 & ipq5332) being added to
> the binding in the upcoming series.
> So, shall we rename the binding to qcom,ipq-pwm.yaml
I prefer not.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists