linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/8] shmem: shmem_acct_blocks() and shmem_inode_acct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9124094-e4ab-8be7-ef80-9a87bdc2e4fc@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] shmem: shmem_acct_blocks() and
 shmem_inode_acct_blocks()

By historical accident, shmem_acct_block() and shmem_inode_acct_block()
were never pluralized when the pages argument was added, despite their
complements being shmem_unacct_blocks() and shmem_inode_unacct_blocks()
all along.  It has been an irritation: fix their naming at last.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
---
 mm/shmem.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index caee8ba841f7..63ba6037b23a 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -189,10 +189,10 @@ static inline int shmem_reacct_size(unsigned long flags,
 /*
  * ... whereas tmpfs objects are accounted incrementally as
  * pages are allocated, in order to allow large sparse files.
- * shmem_get_folio reports shmem_acct_block failure as -ENOSPC not -ENOMEM,
+ * shmem_get_folio reports shmem_acct_blocks failure as -ENOSPC not -ENOMEM,
  * so that a failure on a sparse tmpfs mapping will give SIGBUS not OOM.
  */
-static inline int shmem_acct_block(unsigned long flags, long pages)
+static inline int shmem_acct_blocks(unsigned long flags, long pages)
 {
 	if (!(flags & VM_NORESERVE))
 		return 0;
@@ -207,13 +207,13 @@ static inline void shmem_unacct_blocks(unsigned long flags, long pages)
 		vm_unacct_memory(pages * VM_ACCT(PAGE_SIZE));
 }
 
-static int shmem_inode_acct_block(struct inode *inode, long pages)
+static int shmem_inode_acct_blocks(struct inode *inode, long pages)
 {
 	struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
 	struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
 	int err = -ENOSPC;
 
-	if (shmem_acct_block(info->flags, pages))
+	if (shmem_acct_blocks(info->flags, pages))
 		return err;
 
 	might_sleep();	/* when quotas */
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ bool shmem_charge(struct inode *inode, long pages)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
 
-	if (shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, pages))
+	if (shmem_inode_acct_blocks(inode, pages))
 		return false;
 
 	/* nrpages adjustment first, then shmem_recalc_inode() when balanced */
@@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ static struct folio *shmem_alloc_and_acct_folio(gfp_t gfp, struct inode *inode,
 		huge = false;
 	nr = huge ? HPAGE_PMD_NR : 1;
 
-	err = shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, nr);
+	err = shmem_inode_acct_blocks(inode, nr);
 	if (err)
 		goto failed;
 
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(pmd_t *dst_pmd,
 	int ret;
 	pgoff_t max_off;
 
-	if (shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, 1)) {
+	if (shmem_inode_acct_blocks(inode, 1)) {
 		/*
 		 * We may have got a page, returned -ENOENT triggering a retry,
 		 * and now we find ourselves with -ENOMEM. Release the page, to
-- 
2.35.3