[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309301400.4E1AD87@keescook>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 14:01:11 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: mm: Update mmap_rnd_bits_max
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 10:02:35AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 03:52:22PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:54 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:11:58PM +0000, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > > ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MAX is based on Sv39, which leaves a few
> > > > potential bits of mmap randomness on the table if we end up enabling
> > > > 4/5-level paging. Update mmap_rnd_bits_max to take the final address
> > > > space size into account. This increases mmap_rnd_bits_max from 24 to
> > > > 33 with Sv48/57.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > I like this. Is RISCV the only arch where the paging level can be chosen
> > > at boot time?
> >
> > I haven't seen this elsewhere, but I also haven't looked at all the
> > other architectures that closely. arm64 does something interesting
> > with ARM64_VA_BITS_52, but I think we can still handle that in
> > Kconfig.
>
> AFAIU, x86-64 can do this also:
>
> no4lvl [RISCV] Disable 4-level and 5-level paging modes. Forces
> kernel to use 3-level paging instead.
>
> no5lvl [X86-64,RISCV] Disable 5-level paging mode. Forces
> kernel to use 4-level paging instead.
Ah-ha! Okay, well, then let's track this idea:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/346
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists