[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8be59c9e06fca8eff2f264abb4c2f74db0b19a9e.1696156198.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 13:07:22 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: keescook@...omium.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: openvswitch: Use struct_size()
Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
This is less verbose and more robust.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
This is IMHO more readable, even if not perfect.
However (untested):
+ new = kzalloc(size_add(struct_size(new, masks, size),
size_mul(sizeof(u64), size)), GFP_KERNEL);
looks completely unreadable to me.
---
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 4f3b1798e0b2..d108ae0bd0ee 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -220,16 +220,13 @@ static struct mask_array *tbl_mask_array_alloc(int size)
struct mask_array *new;
size = max(MASK_ARRAY_SIZE_MIN, size);
- new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mask_array) +
- sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask *) * size +
+ new = kzalloc(struct_size(new, masks, size) +
sizeof(u64) * size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new)
return NULL;
new->masks_usage_zero_cntr = (u64 *)((u8 *)new +
- sizeof(struct mask_array) +
- sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask *) *
- size);
+ struct_size(new, masks, size));
new->masks_usage_stats = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct mask_array_stats) +
sizeof(u64) * size,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists