[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNxxWtZ32F4AR9jbp3upvouF29WYDTAn-QHetx4yOD6hvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:48:52 -0400
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ARM: Select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP to fix restricted DMA
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:52 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, at 15:24, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:17 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023, at 10:00, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> >
> > Our RC is definitely not coherent with the ARM/ARM64 caches.
>
> Ok, thanks for the confirmation.
>
> >> It's unlikely but not impossible, as the driver has some
> >> unusual constructs, using a lot of coherent mappings that
> >> might otherwise be streaming mappings, and relying on
> >> dma_sync_single_for_device(..., DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) for other
> >> data, but without the corresponding dma_sync_single_for_cpu().
> >> If all the testing happens on x86, this might easily lead
> >> to a bug that only shows up on non-coherent systems but
> >> is never seen during testing.
> >>
> >> If the problem is not the "dma-coherent" property, can you
> >> double-check if using a different PCIe device works, or narrow
> >> down which specific buffer you saw get corrupted?
> >
> > I've done some testing, below are the results. The new two devices, a
> > USB controller
> > and an M2 NVMe stick, behave the same as iwlwifi.
> >
> > Note that I'm not advocating that "select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP" is the
> > anser, I'm just showing that it fixes my examples.
>
> Ok, so I think we can stop looking at the device drivers for
> bugs then.
>
> > VER PCI-DEV <--------- RESTRICTED DMA --------->
> > ARM64 ARM ARM64 ARM ARM+DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
> > 5.15 iwlwifi P P P F P
> > 5.15 nvme P P P F P
> > 5.15 usb P P P F P
> >
> > 6.1 iwlwifi P P P F P
> > 6.1 nvme P P P F P
> > 6.1 usb P P P F P
> >
> > Upstrm iwlwifi P P F F F
> > Upstrm nvme P P F F F
> > Upstrm usb P P F F F
> > ARM64 ARM ARM64 ARM ARM+DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
> > VER PCI-DEV <--------- RESTRICTED DMA --------->
> >
> > LEGEND:
> > P := pass, driver probe and some functional test performed
> > F := fail, usually when probe is called; impossible to do
> > functional test
> > Upstrm := 633b47cb009d "Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi"
> >
> > iwlwifi := 7260 Wifi 8086:08b1
> > nvme := 1e95:1007
> > usb := Supahub, 1912:0014
>
> Thanks for the thorough testing, that looks very useful, even though
> I don't have an answer immediately. Maybe Robin can see something
> here that I don't.
>
> It's particularly interesting how arm64 only started failing
> on fairly recent kernels, so if nothing else helps you could
> always try bisecting the history between 6.1 and 633b47cb009d,
> hoping that the commit that broke it points us to the arm32
> problem.
>
> The only change I see in that time frame that seems related
> is 7bd6680b47fa ("Revert "Revert "arm64: dma: Drop cache
> invalidation from arch_dma_prep_coherent()"""), so you could
> start by reverting that. However, it's probably something
> else since this is for the coherent mappings, not the
> streaming ones.
Hi Arnd,
I started to do the bisection and it was clear early on that something
else was afoot --
it turns out that our 6.1 and 5.15 builds included a NAK'd upstream
commit which was required
by our legacy DT tree. Once I updated our DT tree, the upstream results matched
those of 6.1 and 5.15. I've included the new results below.
Long story short, it appears that restricted DMA does not work with ARCH=arm
platforms using non-dma-coherent devices. AFAICT, the
dma_alloc_coherent() function
should return a pointer to an uncacheable page -- the only way our system can
have coherent memory -- but it is not.
The "select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP" makes things work in 5.15, 6.1 and upstream,
although I cannot really say if that is a viable solution.
Regards,
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB/CM
VER PCI-DEV <--------- RESTRICTED DMA --------->
ARM64 ARM ARM64 ARM ARM+DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
5.15 iwlwifi P P P F P
5.15 nvme P P P F P
5.15 usb P P P F P
6.1 iwlwifi P P P F P
6.1 nvme P P P F P
6.1 usb P P P F P
Upstrm iwlwifi P P P F P
Upstrm nvme P P P F P
Upstrm usb P P P F P
ARM64 ARM ARM64 ARM ARM+DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
VER PCI-DEV <--------- RESTRICTED DMA --------->
LEGEND:
P := pass, driver probe and some functional test performed
F := fail, usually when probe is called; impossible to do
functional test
Upstrm := 633b47cb009d "Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi"
iwlwifi := 7260 Wifi 8086:08b1
nvme := 1e95:1007
usb := Supahub, 1912:0014
>
> Arnd
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4210 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists