| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 00:07:58 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Sean Young <sean@...s.org>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic
context
Hi Sean,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on thierry-reding-pwm/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on shawnguo/for-next atorgue-stm32/stm32-next media-tree/master linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Young/media-pwm-ir-tx-trigger-edges-from-hrtimer-interrupt-context/20231001-194056
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1bd5241d584ceb4d6b731c4dc3203fb9686ee1d1.1696156485.git.sean%40mess.org
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20231001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:10,
from include/linux/sched.h:12,
from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
from include/linux/device.h:15,
from include/linux/backlight.h:12,
from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:8:
include/linux/pwm.h: In function 'pwm_apply_state':
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_can_sleep'; did you mean 'gpiod_cansleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
In file included from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:16:0:
include/linux/pwm.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/pwm.h:455:20: error: conflicting types for 'pwm_can_sleep'
static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:10,
from include/linux/sched.h:12,
from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
from include/linux/device.h:15,
from include/linux/backlight.h:12,
from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:8:
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pwm_can_sleep' was here
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/linux/i2c.h:13,
from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:11:
include/linux/pwm.h: In function 'pwm_apply_state':
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_can_sleep'; did you mean 'cant_sleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
In file included from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:18:0:
include/linux/pwm.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/pwm.h:455:20: error: conflicting types for 'pwm_can_sleep'
static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/linux/i2c.h:13,
from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:11:
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pwm_can_sleep' was here
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/pwm_can_sleep +455 include/linux/pwm.h
454
> 455 static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
456 {
457 return true;
458 }
459
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists