[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023100116-headscarf-dreaded-cf8e@gregkh>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:12:34 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jonathan Bergh <bergh.jonathan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: usb: Remove unnecessary whitespace in function
pointer declaration
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 10:41:36PM +0200, Jonathan Bergh wrote:
> Fixed a formatting issue flagged by checkpatch where unnecessary
> whitespace was included before the parameter list in the function
> pointer declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bergh <bergh.jonathan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/c67x00/c67x00.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/c67x00/c67x00.h b/drivers/usb/c67x00/c67x00.h
> index a4456d0fffa9..3673357818b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/c67x00/c67x00.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/c67x00/c67x00.h
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ struct c67x00_sie {
> /* Entries to be used by the subdrivers */
> spinlock_t lock; /* protect this structure */
> void *private_data;
> - void (*irq) (struct c67x00_sie *sie, u16 int_status, u16 msg);
> + void (*irq)(struct c67x00_sie *sie, u16 int_status, u16 msg);
Same comment as on the other patches, subject line is incorrect, and why
do this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists