linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] pata_parport: fix pata_parport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d040b3f7-4222-a027-34d0-5cf62aa63605@omp.ru>
Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2023 21:43:09 +0300
From:   Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To:     Ondrej Zary <linux@...y.sk>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pata_parport: fix pata_parport_devchk

Hello!

On 9/30/23 10:15 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:

> There's a 'x' missing in 0x55 in pata_parport_devchk(), causing the
> detection to always fail. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@...y.sk>

   I think we need a Fixes: tag here...

> ---
>  drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
> index 1af64d435d3c..258d189f42e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static bool pata_parport_devchk(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int device)
>  	pi->proto->write_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_NSECT, 0xaa);
>  	pi->proto->write_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_LBAL, 0x55);
>  
> -	pi->proto->write_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_NSECT, 055);
> +	pi->proto->write_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_NSECT, 0x55);

   Oh, Gawd! How did this ever work?! :-/
   This bug seems to predate the Big PARIDE move...

>  	pi->proto->write_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_LBAL, 0xaa);
>  
>  	nsect = pi->proto->read_regr(pi, 0, ATA_REG_NSECT);
> 

MBR, Sergey