[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231002085902.63b6cpql5tgwdhbw@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:59:02 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: pwm-ir-tx: trigger edges from hrtimer
interrupt context
Hello Sean,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:20:20AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> Having said that, the extra call to pwm_apply_state() may have benefits,
> see this comment in the pwm-sifive driver:
>
> * - When changing both duty cycle and period, we cannot prevent in
> * software that the output might produce a period with mixed
> * settings (new period length and old duty cycle).
You don't gain anything here I think. Disabling a PWM might also result
in a constant active level. If you want to prevent this, your best bet
is to never disable the PWM.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists