lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:43:06 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/7] gpio: vf610: add i.MX8ULP of_device_id entry

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] gpio: vf610: add i.MX8ULP of_device_id entry
> 
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 10:23 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > i.MX8ULP/93 GPIO supports similar feature as i.MX7ULP GPIO, but
> > i.MX8ULP is actually not hardware compatible with i.MX7ULP. i.MX8ULP
> > only has one register base, not two bases. i.MX8ULP and i.MX93
> > actually has two interrupts for each gpio controller, one for
> > Trustzone non-secure world, one for secure world.
> >
> > Although the Linux Kernel driver gpio-vf610.c could work with
> > fsl,imx7ulp-gpio compatible, it is based on some tricks did in device
> > tree with some offset added to base address.
> >
> > Add a new of_device_id entry for i.MX8ULP. But to make the driver
> > could also support old bindings, check the compatible string first,
> > before check the device data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 47
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > index dbc7ba0ee72c..8e12706c0b22 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >  struct fsl_gpio_soc_data {
> >         /* SoCs has a Port Data Direction Register (PDDR) */
> >         bool have_paddr;
> > +       bool have_dual_base;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct vf610_gpio_port {
> > @@ -60,13 +61,26 @@ struct vf610_gpio_port {
> >  #define PORT_INT_EITHER_EDGE   0xb
> >  #define PORT_INT_LOGIC_ONE     0xc
> >
> > +#define IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF  0x40
> > +#define IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF       0x80
> > +
> > +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data vf610_data = {
> > +       .have_dual_base = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx_data = {
> >         .have_paddr = true,
> > +       .have_dual_base = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx8ulp_data = {
> > +       .have_paddr = true,
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id vf610_gpio_dt_ids[] = {
> > -       { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio",       .data = NULL, },
> > +       { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio",       .data = &vf610_data },
> >         { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio",     .data = &imx_data, },
> > +       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio",     .data = &imx8ulp_data, },
> >         { /* sentinel */ }
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -263,19 +277,38 @@ static int vf610_gpio_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >         struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
> >         int i;
> >         int ret;
> > +       bool dual_base;
> >
> >         port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         if (!port)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >         port->sdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > -       port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(port->base))
> > -               return PTR_ERR(port->base);
> >
> > -       port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base))
> > -               return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base);
> > +       dual_base = port->sdata->have_dual_base;
> > +
> > +       /* support old compatible strings */
> > +       if (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio") &&
> > +           (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx93-gpio") ||
> 
> Why not just add this compatible to vf610_gpio_dt_ids?

"fsl,imx93-gpio", "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio" is not a correct entry
combination. This is to support legacy old compatible
strings.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> Bart
> 
> > +           (device_is_compatible(dev, "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"))))
> > +               dual_base = true;
> > +
> > +       if (dual_base) {
> > +               port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(port->base))
> > +                       return PTR_ERR(port->base);
> > +
> > +               port->gpio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(port->gpio_base))
> > +                       return PTR_ERR(port->gpio_base);
> > +       } else {
> > +               port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(port->base))
> > +                       return PTR_ERR(port->base);
> > +
> > +               port->gpio_base = port->base + IMX8ULP_GPIO_BASE_OFF;
> > +               port->base = port->base + IMX8ULP_BASE_OFF;
> > +       }
> >
> >         port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >         if (port->irq < 0)
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ