[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f3c8a66-aba3-cef0-8df9-f897487f1098@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:51:17 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] phy: qcom: edp: Introduce support for DisplayPort
On 10/2/23 11:06, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:07:44PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> The eDP phy can be used to drive either eDP or DP output, with some
>> minor variations in some of the configuration and seemingly a need for
>> implementing swing and pre_emphasis calibration.
>>
>> Introduce a config object, indicating if the phy is operating in eDP or
>> DP mode and swing/pre-emphasis calibration to support this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> index 32614fb838b5..301ac422d2fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> @@ -70,8 +70,19 @@
>>
>> #define TXn_TRAN_DRVR_EMP_EN 0x0078
>>
>> +struct qcom_edp_cfg {
>> + bool is_dp;
>> +
>> + /* DP PHY swing and pre_emphasis tables */
>> + const u8 (*swing_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
>> + const u8 (*swing_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
>> + const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
>> + const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
>> +};
>
>> static int qcom_edp_configure_ssc(const struct qcom_edp *edp)
>> @@ -315,7 +381,9 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_vco_div(const struct qcom_edp *edp)
>> static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>> const struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> + const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
>> u32 bias0_en, drvr0_en, bias1_en, drvr1_en;
>> + u8 ldo_config;
>> int timeout;
>> int ret;
>> u32 val;
>> @@ -332,8 +400,11 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> if (timeout)
>> return timeout;
>>
>> - writel(0x01, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> - writel(0x01, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> +
>> + ldo_config = (cfg && cfg->is_dp) ? 0x1 : 0x0;
>> +
>> + writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> + writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>
> When reviewing a patch from Konrad which will start using the eDP
> configuration on the X13s, I noticed that this patch inverted these bits
> for older SoCs (e.g. sc7280 and sc8180xp). They used to be set to 1,
> but after this patch they will be set to 0.
>
> Was that intentional even if it was never mentioned in the commit
> message? Or was it a mistake that should be fixed?
+Abhinav, Jessica
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists