lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:02:51 +0000
From:   "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Sun, Yi" <yi.sun@...el.com>
CC:     "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Su, Heng" <heng.su@...el.com>,
        "yi.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Yan, Dongcheng" <dongcheng.yan@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tdx: Dump TDX version During the TD Bootup

On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 13:38 +0300, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:11:10AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> > It is essential for TD users to be aware of the vendor and version of
> > the current TDX. Additionally, they can reference the TDX version when
> > reporting bugs or issues.
> > 
> > Furthermore, the applications or device drivers running in TD can achieve
> > enhanced reliability and flexibility by following the TDX Module ABI
> > specification, because there are significant differences between different
> > versions of TDX, as mentioned in the "IntelĀ® TDX Module Incompatibilities
> > between v1.0 and v1.5" reference. Here are a few examples:
> > 
> > MSR Name		Index		Reason
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > IA32_UARCH_MISC_CTL	0x1B01		From v1.5
> > IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES	0x010A		Changed in v1.5
> > IA32_TSX_CTRL		0x0122		Changed in v1.5
> > 
> > CPUID Leaf	Sub-leaf	Reason
> > ---------------------------------------
> > 0x7		2		From v1.5
> > 0x22		0		From v1.5
> > 0x23		0~3		From v1.5
> > 0x80000007	0		From v1.5
> > 
> > During TD initialization, the TDX version info can be obtained by calling
> > TDG.SYS.RD. This will fetch the current version of TDX, including the major
> > and minor version numbers and vendor ID.
> > 
> > The TDCALL TDG.SYS.RD originates from TDX version 1.5. If the error
> > TDCALL_INVALID_OPERAND occurs, it should be treated as TDX version 1.0.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Dongcheng Yan <dongcheng.yan@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dongcheng Yan <dongcheng.yan@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.sun@...el.com>
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> But you need to send it to x86 maintainers. I've CCed x86@, but you might
> need to resend it properly to maintainers.
> 

I looked at the patch on lore.kernel.org:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230930161110.3251107-1-yi.sun@intel.com/T/

It seems it hasn't been rebased to the latest tip/x86/tdx yet, which has patches
to unify TDCALL/TDVMCALL assembly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ