[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a826da8-a94d-261b-cfe8-c494d7237a0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 14:31:18 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests/resctrl: Fixes to failing tests
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Fix four issues with resctrl selftests.
>
> The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes
> and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review.
>
> The other two came up when I ran resctrl selftests across the server
> fleet in our lab to validate the upcoming CAT test rewrite (the rewrite
> is not part of this series).
>
> These are developed and should apply cleanly at least on top the
> benchmark cleanup series (might apply cleanly also w/o the benchmark
> series, I didn't test).
LKP seems to no longer happy to apply this cleanly without the benchmark
rework series as the signal handling fix got now a bigger footprint
(maybe LKP didn't build v3 at all as the changes from v3->v4 were really
small and I did not get error out of v3).
Shuah, would you want me to reorganize this such that it goes in before
the benchmark series? In any case, I'll wait until Reinette has had time
to look at the first patch if I'm to send the series reordered.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists