[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231002064646.GA1799@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 08:46:46 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] fs: release anon dev_t in deactivate_locked_super
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Before your patch: foo_kill_super() calls kill_anon_super(),
> which calls kill_super_notify(), which removes the sucker from
> the list, then frees ->s_fs_info. After your patch:
> removal from the lists happens via the call of kill_super_notify()
> *after* both of your methods had been called, while freeing
> ->s_fs_info happens from the method call. IOW, you've restored
> the situation prior to "super: ensure valid info". The whole
> point of that commit had been to make sure that we have nothing
> in the lists with ->s_fs_info pointing to a freed object.
>
> It's not about free_anon_bdev(); that part is fine - it's the
> "we can drop the weird second call site of kill_super_notify()"
> thing that is broken.
The point has been to only release the anon dev_t after
kill_super_notify, to prevent two of them beeing reused.
Which we do as the free_anon_bdev is done directly in
deactivate_locked_super. The new ->free_sb for non-block file systems
frees resources, but none of them matter for sget.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists