[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231002172005.GC92317@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 19:20:05 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 03/15] phy: ethernet: add configuration
interface for copper backplane Ethernet PHYs
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:11:10PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:05:36PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 04:48:52PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +/**
> > > + * coef_update_opposite - return the opposite of one C72 coefficient update
> > > + * request
> > > + *
> > > + * @update: original coefficient update
> > > + *
> > > + * Helper to transform the update request of one equalization tap into a
> > > + * request of the same tap in the opposite direction. May be used by C72
> > > + * phy remote TX link training algorithms.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline enum coef_update coef_update_opposite(enum coef_update update)
> >
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > another nit from me.
> >
> > Please put the inline keyword first.
> > Likewise elsewhere in this patch.
> >
> > Tooling, including gcc-13 with W=1, complains about this.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I guess you are talking about the c72_coef_update_print()
> function, whose prototype is mistakenly "static void inline" instead of
> "static inline void". I cannot find the problem with the quoted coef_update_opposite().
Yes, you are right.
Sorry for my error.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists