[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acc2a406-2cff-eb3b-7661-1a93d4749bf2@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:43:34 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>, suzuki.poulose@....com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, leo.yan@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com,
gcherian@...vell.com, Anil Kumar Reddy <areddy3@...vell.com>,
Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] coresight: tmc: Add support for reading tracedata
from previous boot
On 29/09/2023 14:37, Linu Cherian wrote:
> * Introduce a new mode CS_MODE_READ_PREVBOOT for reading tracedata
> captured in previous boot.
>
> * Add special handlers for preparing ETR/ETF for this special mode
>
> * User can read the trace data as below
>
> For example, for reading trace data from tmc_etf sink
>
> 1. cd /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etfXX/
>
> 2. Change mode to READ_PREVBOOT
>
> #echo 1 > read_prevboot
>
> 3. Dump trace buffer data to a file,
>
> #dd if=/dev/tmc_etrXX of=~/cstrace.bin
>
> 4. Reset back to normal mode
>
> #echo 0 > read_prevboot
>
> Signed-off-by: Anil Kumar Reddy <areddy3@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>
> ---
> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 1 +
> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c | 81 +++++++++-
> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 62 ++++++++
> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 6 +
> include/linux/coresight.h | 13 ++
> 6 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> index 77b0271ce6eb..513baf681280 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> @@ -1010,6 +1010,7 @@ static void etm4_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>
> switch (mode) {
> case CS_MODE_DISABLED:
> + case CS_MODE_READ_PREVBOOT:
> break;
> case CS_MODE_SYSFS:
> etm4_disable_sysfs(csdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> index 6658ce76777b..65c15c9f821b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,45 @@ u32 tmc_get_memwidth_mask(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> return mask;
> }
>
> +int tmc_read_prepare_prevboot(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct tmc_register_snapshot *reg_ptr;
> + struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
> +
> + if (!drvdata->metadata.vaddr) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + reg_ptr = drvdata->metadata.vaddr;
> + if (!reg_ptr->valid) {
> + dev_err(&drvdata->csdev->dev,
> + "Invalid metadata captured from previous boot\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
I'm wondering if a more robust check is needed than the valid flag, like
a checksum or something. I didn't debug it yet but I ended up with an
invalid set of metadata after a panic reboot, see below. I'm not sure if
it's just a logic bug or something got lost during the reboot, I didn't
debug it yet. But I suppose unless you assume the panic didn't affect
writing the metadata, then it could be partially written and shouldn't
be trusted?
[...]
> +
> +static int tmc_etr_sync_prevboot_buf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
> +{
> + u32 status;
> + u64 rrp, rwp, dba;
> + struct tmc_register_snapshot *reg_ptr;
> + struct etr_buf *etr_buf = drvdata->prevboot_buf;
> +
> + reg_ptr = drvdata->metadata.vaddr;
> +
> + rrp = reg_ptr->rrp;
> + rwp = reg_ptr->rwp;
> + dba = reg_ptr->dba;
> + status = reg_ptr->sts;
> +
> + etr_buf->full = !!(status & TMC_STS_FULL);
> +
> + /* Sync the buffer pointers */
> + etr_buf->offset = rrp - dba;
> + if (etr_buf->full)
> + etr_buf->len = etr_buf->size;
> + else
> + etr_buf->len = rwp - rrp;
> +
> + /* Sanity checks for validating metadata */
> + if ((etr_buf->offset > etr_buf->size) ||
> + (etr_buf->len > etr_buf->size))
> + return -EINVAL;
The values I got here are 0x781b67182aa346f9 0x8000000 0x8000000 for
offset, size and len respectively. This fails the first check. It would
also be nice to have a dev_dbg here as well, it's basically the same as
the valid check above which does have one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists