[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F23E4B79-8FEB-4398-8C12-EAEACDE4AE1B@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:06:55 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...a.com>
To: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
CC: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...a.com>,
"himadrispandya@...il.com" <himadrispandya@...il.com>,
"julia.lawall@...ia.fr" <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling
CPU
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 4:47 PM, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com> wrote:
>
> BPF supports creating high resolution timers using bpf_timer_* helper
> functions. Currently, only the BPF_F_TIMER_ABS flag is supported, which
> specifies that the timeout should be interpreted as absolute time. It
> would also be useful to be able to pin that timer to a core. For
> example, if you wanted to make a subset of cores run without timer
> interrupts, and only have the timer be invoked on a single core.
>
> This patch adds support for this with a new BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN flag.
> When specified, the HRTIMER_MODE_PINNED flag is passed to
> hrtimer_start(). A subsequent patch will update selftests to validate.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists