linux-kernel - [PATCH] fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  4 Oct 2023 02:06:41 +0800
From:   Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
To:     shaggy@...nel.org, liushixin2@...wei.com, yogi.kernel@...il.com,
        andrew.kanner@...il.com
Cc:     jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzbot+38e876a8aa44b7115c76@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref

Both db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the
db_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for
db_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.

The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20
index 7936 is out of range for type 'atomic_t[128]'

Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid
indexes for the db_agfree array.

Reported-by: syzbot+38e876a8aa44b7115c76@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=38e876a8aa44b7115c76
Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
---
 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
index 3a1842348112..4d59373f9e6c 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
@@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ int dbMount(struct inode *ipbmap)
 	bmp->db_maxlevel = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_maxlevel);
 	bmp->db_maxag = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_maxag);
 	bmp->db_agpref = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_agpref);
+	if (bmp->db_maxag >= MAXAG || bmp->db_maxag < 0 ||
+		bmp->db_agpref >= MAXAG || bmp->db_agpref < 0) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_release_metapage;
+	}
+
 	bmp->db_aglevel = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_aglevel);
 	bmp->db_agheight = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_agheight);
 	bmp->db_agwidth = le32_to_cpu(dbmp_le->dn_agwidth);
-- 
2.39.2