[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qejogc2nxbcekhujsh56zlyqssgxolf7vboxwyr7dk7zjznhzy@yt7bqkxefjyp>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:22:48 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memcg: normalize the value passed into
memcg_rstat_updated()
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:57:40PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
> memcg_rstat_updated() uses the value of the state update to keep track
> of the magnitude of pending updates, so that we only do a stats flush
> when it's worth the work. Most values passed into memcg_rstat_updated()
> are in pages, however, a few of them are actually in bytes or KBs.
>
> To put this into perspective, a 512 byte slab allocation today would
> look the same as allocating 512 pages. This may result in premature
> flushes, which means unnecessary work and latency.
>
> Normalize all the state values passed into memcg_rstat_updated() to
> pages.
I've dreamed about such normalization since error estimates were
introduced :-)
(As touched in the previous patch) it makes me wonder whether it makes
sense to add up state and event counters (apples and oranges).
Shouldn't with this approach events: a) have a separate counter, b)
wight with zero and rely on time-based flushing only?
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists