| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpq6VOBx+E94bs39qXzNN1KBJL+Cbf_KMPJC1PcNoHO3wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 00:11:38 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/msm/dp: move of_dp_aux_populate_bus() to eDP probe()
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 23:18, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/3/2023 10:56 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 03/10/2023 20:25, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/27/2023 2:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 23:54, Kuogee Hsieh
> >>> <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>>> Currently eDP population is done at msm_dp_modeset_init() which happen
> >>>> at binding time. Move eDP population to be done at display probe time
> >>>> so that probe deferral cases can be handled effectively.
> >>>> wait_for_hpd_asserted callback is added during drm_dp_aux_init()
> >>>> to ensure eDP's HPD is up before proceeding eDP population.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v4:
> >>>> -- delete duplicate initialize code to dp_aux before
> >>>> drm_dp_aux_register()
> >>>> -- delete of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "aux-bus") and inline
> >>>> the function
> >>>> -- not initialize rc = 0
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v3:
> >>>> -- add done_probing callback into devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus()
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c | 34 ++++++++++++++----
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 69
> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>>> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >>>> index 22eb774..425b5c5 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >>>> @@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ void dp_aux_deinit(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux)
> >>>>
> >>>> int dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - struct dp_aux_private *aux;
> >>>> int ret;
> >>>>
> >>>> if (!dp_aux) {
> >>>> @@ -488,12 +487,7 @@ int dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux)
> >>>> return -EINVAL;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> - aux = container_of(dp_aux, struct dp_aux_private, dp_aux);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - aux->dp_aux.name = "dpu_dp_aux";
> >>>> - aux->dp_aux.dev = aux->dev;
> >>>> - aux->dp_aux.transfer = dp_aux_transfer;
> >>>> - ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&aux->dp_aux);
> >>>> + ret = drm_dp_aux_register(dp_aux);
> >>>> if (ret) {
> >>>> DRM_ERROR("%s: failed to register drm aux: %d\n",
> >>>> __func__,
> >>>> ret);
> >>>> @@ -508,6 +502,21 @@ void dp_aux_unregister(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux)
> >>>> drm_dp_aux_unregister(dp_aux);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static int dp_wait_hpd_asserted(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux,
> >>>> + unsigned long wait_us)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + int ret;
> >>>> + struct dp_aux_private *aux;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + aux = container_of(dp_aux, struct dp_aux_private, dp_aux);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(aux->dev);
> >>>> + ret = dp_catalog_aux_wait_for_hpd_connect_state(aux->catalog);
> >>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(aux->dev);
> >>> Ok, so here you have used put_sync instead of autosuspend. Can we have
> >>> some uniformity? (I'd prefer to see put_sync or just put everywhere)
> >>
> >>
> >> my point is,
> >>
> >> since display is user interface,
> >>
> >> if there has any inputs before timer expire then there is no reason
> >> to execute pm_runtime_suspend().
> >>
> >> otherwise pm_runtime_suspend() should be executed.
> >>
> >> Therefore I used autosuspend at aux_transfer() an
> >> ddp_bridge_atomic_post_disable().
> >>
> >> here is not related to user interface so that i use put_sysn() directly.
> >>
> >> is my point make sense?
> >>
> >> or should I drop all autosuspend and replace them with put_sync()?
> >
> > This was my question from the beginning: what was the reason for using
> > autosuspend? Did it bring any sensible improvement in the disable &
> > reenable path?
>
> ok, i got your point.
>
> 1) I will use put_sync() at dp_bridge_atomic_dsiable() and
> dp_bridge_hpd_disable() instead of put_autosuspend().
>
> 2) keep pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() at dp_aux_transfer().
Why? The panel driver should take care about keeping DP on between transfers.
>
> Is this good?
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux_get(struct device *dev, struct
> >>>> dp_catalog *catalog,
> >>>> bool is_edp)
> >>>> {
> >>>> @@ -531,6 +540,17 @@ struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux_get(struct device
> >>>> *dev, struct dp_catalog *catalog,
> >>>> aux->catalog = catalog;
> >>>> aux->retry_cnt = 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * Use the drm_dp_aux_init() to use the aux adapter
> >>>> + * before registering aux with the DRM device so that
> >>>> + * msm edp panel can be detected by generic_dep_panel_probe().
> >>> eDP, AUX, generic_edp_panel_probe().
> >>>
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + aux->dp_aux.name = "dpu_dp_aux";
> >>>> + aux->dp_aux.dev = dev;
> >>>> + aux->dp_aux.transfer = dp_aux_transfer;
> >>>> + aux->dp_aux.wait_hpd_asserted = dp_wait_hpd_asserted;
> >>>> + drm_dp_aux_init(&aux->dp_aux);
> >>>> +
> >>>> return &aux->dp_aux;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >>>> index 711d262..9a2b403 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >>>> @@ -1203,6 +1203,28 @@ static const struct msm_dp_desc
> >>>> *dp_display_get_desc(struct platform_device *pde
> >>>> return NULL;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static int dp_auxbus_done_probe(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + int rc;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + rc = component_add(aux->dev, &dp_display_comp_ops);
> >>>> + if (rc)
> >>>> + DRM_ERROR("eDP component add failed, rc=%d\n", rc);
> >>> drop.
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return rc;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static inline int dp_display_auxbus_population(struct
> >>>> dp_display_private *dp)
> >>> It's not `population`. It is just `populate`.
> >>>
> >>> Also please inline this function.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + int ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ret = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(dp->aux,
> >>>> dp_auxbus_done_probe);
> >>>> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> >>>> + DRM_ERROR("aux-bus not found\n");
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static int dp_display_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>> {
> >>>> int rc = 0;
> >>>> @@ -1271,10 +1293,16 @@ static int dp_display_probe(struct
> >>>> platform_device *pdev)
> >>>> if (rc)
> >>>> return rc;
> >>>>
> >>>> - rc = component_add(&pdev->dev, &dp_display_comp_ops);
> >>>> - if (rc) {
> >>>> - DRM_ERROR("component add failed, rc=%d\n", rc);
> >>>> - dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
> >>>> + if (dp->dp_display.is_edp) {
> >>>> + rc = dp_display_auxbus_population(dp);
> >>>> + if (rc)
> >>>> + DRM_ERROR("eDP auxbus population failed,
> >>>> rc=%d\n", rc);
> >>>> + } else {
> >>>> + rc = component_add(&pdev->dev, &dp_display_comp_ops);
> >>>> + if (rc) {
> >>>> + DRM_ERROR("component add failed, rc=%d\n",
> >>>> rc);
> >>>> + dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return rc;
> >>>> @@ -1285,8 +1313,6 @@ static int dp_display_remove(struct
> >>>> platform_device *pdev)
> >>>> struct dp_display_private *dp =
> >>>> dev_get_dp_display_private(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>
> >>>> component_del(&pdev->dev, &dp_display_comp_ops);
> >>>> - dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
> >>>> -
> >>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> >>>>
> >>>> dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
> >>>> @@ -1385,29 +1411,8 @@ static int dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct
> >>>> msm_dp *dp)
> >>>> {
> >>>> int rc;
> >>>> struct dp_display_private *dp_priv;
> >>>> - struct device_node *aux_bus;
> >>>> - struct device *dev;
> >>>>
> >>>> dp_priv = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private,
> >>>> dp_display);
> >>>> - dev = &dp_priv->pdev->dev;
> >>>> - aux_bus = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "aux-bus");
> >>>> -
> >>>> - if (aux_bus && dp->is_edp) {
> >>>> - /*
> >>>> - * The code below assumes that the panel will
> >>>> finish probing
> >>>> - * by the time devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices()
> >>>> returns.
> >>>> - * This isn't a great assumption since it will fail
> >>>> if the
> >>>> - * panel driver is probed asynchronously but is the
> >>>> best we
> >>>> - * can do without a bigger driver reorganization.
> >>>> - */
> >>>> - rc = of_dp_aux_populate_bus(dp_priv->aux, NULL);
> >>>> - of_node_put(aux_bus);
> >>>> - if (rc)
> >>>> - goto error;
> >>>> - } else if (dp->is_edp) {
> >>>> - DRM_ERROR("eDP aux_bus not found\n");
> >>>> - return -ENODEV;
> >>>> - }
> >>>>
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * External bridges are mandatory for eDP interfaces: one
> >>>> has to
> >>>> @@ -1420,17 +1425,9 @@ static int dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct
> >>>> msm_dp *dp)
> >>>> if (!dp->is_edp && rc == -ENODEV)
> >>>> return 0;
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (!rc) {
> >>>> + if (!rc)
> >>>> dp->next_bridge = dp_priv->parser->next_bridge;
> >>>> - return 0;
> >>>> - }
> >>>>
> >>>> -error:
> >>>> - if (dp->is_edp) {
> >>>> - of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus(dp_priv->aux);
> >>>> - dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp_priv);
> >>>> - dp_display_host_deinit(dp_priv);
> >>>> - }
> >>>> return rc;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists