linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f448b5e-de75-35fa-02ab-7cbd37389227@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:13:35 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
        <carl@...amperecomputing.com>, <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>, <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
        <xingxin.hx@...nanolis.org>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
        Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>,
        <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a
 CLOSID has

Hi James,

On 9/14/2023 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:

...

> @@ -796,13 +817,30 @@ void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms)
>  static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	u32 idx_limit = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> +	u32 num_closid = resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(r);
>  	struct rmid_entry *entry = NULL;
> +	int err = 0, i;
>  	u32 idx;
> -	int i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> +		int *tmp;
> +
> +		tmp = kcalloc(num_closid, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);

Shouldn't this rather be sizeof(unsigned int) to match the type it will store?

> +		if (!tmp) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out_unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		closid_num_dirty_rmid = tmp;
> +	}
>  
>  	rmid_ptrs = kcalloc(idx_limit, sizeof(struct rmid_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rmid_ptrs)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!rmid_ptrs) {
> +		kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < idx_limit; i++) {
>  		entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
> @@ -822,13 +860,21 @@ static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	entry = __rmid_entry(idx);
>  	list_del(&entry->list);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  void resctrl_exit_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>  
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> +		kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> +		closid_num_dirty_rmid = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	kfree(rmid_ptrs);
>  	rmid_ptrs = NULL;
>  

Awaiting response on patch #2 related to above hunk.

Reinette