| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=O8X+ZRNEzzs+NYBAh9QJLObxKPOpmFo-ci4Aw=MR=0+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 15:09:36 -0700
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
riel@...riel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeelb@...gle.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev, tj@...nel.org,
lizefan.x@...edance.com, shuah@...nel.org, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
fvdl@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hugetlb: memcg: account hugetlb-backed memory in
memory controller
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:39 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 11:01:24AM -0700, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:13 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/02/23 17:18, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > > index de220e3ff8be..74472e911b0a 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > > @@ -1902,6 +1902,7 @@ void free_huge_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > > > pages_per_huge_page(h), folio);
> > > > hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(hstate_index(h),
> > > > pages_per_huge_page(h), folio);
> > > > + mem_cgroup_uncharge(folio);
> > > > if (restore_reserve)
> > > > h->resv_huge_pages++;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -3009,11 +3010,20 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > struct hugepage_subpool *spool = subpool_vma(vma);
> > > > struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
> > > > struct folio *folio;
> > > > - long map_chg, map_commit;
> > > > + long map_chg, map_commit, nr_pages = pages_per_huge_page(h);
> > > > long gbl_chg;
> > > > - int ret, idx;
> > > > + int memcg_charge_ret, ret, idx;
> > > > struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = NULL;
> > > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > > > bool deferred_reserve;
> > > > + gfp_t gfp = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
> > > > +
> > > > + memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_current();
> > > > + memcg_charge_ret = mem_cgroup_hugetlb_try_charge(memcg, gfp, nr_pages);
> > > > + if (memcg_charge_ret == -ENOMEM) {
> > > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > idx = hstate_index(h);
> > > > /*
> > > > @@ -3022,8 +3032,12 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > * code of zero indicates a reservation exists (no change).
> > > > */
> > > > map_chg = gbl_chg = vma_needs_reservation(h, vma, addr);
> > > > - if (map_chg < 0)
> > > > + if (map_chg < 0) {
> > > > + if (!memcg_charge_ret)
> > > > + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(memcg, nr_pages);
> > > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Processes that did not create the mapping will have no
> > > > @@ -3034,10 +3048,8 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > */
> > > > if (map_chg || avoid_reserve) {
> > > > gbl_chg = hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, 1);
> > > > - if (gbl_chg < 0) {
> > > > - vma_end_reservation(h, vma, addr);
> > > > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> > > > - }
> > > > + if (gbl_chg < 0)
> > > > + goto out_end_reservation;
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Even though there was no reservation in the region/reserve
> > > > @@ -3119,6 +3131,11 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(hstate_index(h),
> > > > pages_per_huge_page(h), folio);
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!memcg_charge_ret)
> > > > + mem_cgroup_commit_charge(folio, memcg);
> > > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > > +
> > > > return folio;
> > > >
> > > > out_uncharge_cgroup:
> > > > @@ -3130,7 +3147,11 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > out_subpool_put:
> > > > if (map_chg || avoid_reserve)
> > > > hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
> > > > +out_end_reservation:
> > > > vma_end_reservation(h, vma, addr);
> > > > + if (!memcg_charge_ret)
> > > > + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(memcg, nr_pages);
> > > > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > IIUC, huge page usage is charged in alloc_hugetlb_folio and uncharged in
> > > free_huge_folio. During migration, huge pages are allocated via
> > > alloc_migrate_hugetlb_folio, not alloc_hugetlb_folio. So, there is no
> > > charging for the migration target page and we uncharge the source page.
> > > It looks like there will be no charge for the huge page after migration?
> > >
> >
> > Ah I see! This is a bit subtle indeed.
> >
> > For the hugetlb controller, it looks like they update the cgroup info
> > inside move_hugetlb_state(), which calls hugetlb_cgroup_migrate()
> > to transfer the hugetlb cgroup info to the destination folio.
> >
> > Perhaps we can do something analogous here.
> >
> > > If my analysis above is correct, then we may need to be careful about
> > > this accounting. We may not want both source and target pages to be
> > > charged at the same time.
> >
> > We can create a variant of mem_cgroup_migrate that does not double
> > charge, but instead just copy the mem_cgroup information to the new
> > folio, and then clear that info from the old folio. That way the memory
> > usage counters are untouched.
> >
> > Somebody with more expertise on migration should fact check me
> > of course :)
>
> The only reason mem_cgroup_migrate() double charges right now is
> because it's used by replace_page_cache_folio(). In that context, the
> isolation of the old page isn't quite as thorough as with migration,
> so it cannot transfer and uncharge directly. This goes back a long
> time: 0a31bc97c80c3fa87b32c091d9a930ac19cd0c40
>
> If you rename the current implementation to mem_cgroup_replace_page()
> for that one caller, you can add a mem_cgroup_migrate() variant which
> is charge neutral and clears old->memcg_data. This can be used for
> regular and hugetlb page migration. Something like this (totally
> untested):
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a4d3282493b6..17ec45bf3653 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -7226,29 +7226,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
>
> - /* Page cache replacement: new folio already charged? */
> - if (folio_memcg(new))
> - return;
> -
> memcg = folio_memcg(old);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg, old);
> if (!memcg)
> return;
>
> - /* Force-charge the new page. The old one will be freed soon */
> - if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
> - page_counter_charge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> - if (do_memsw_account())
> - page_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> - }
> -
> - css_get(&memcg->css);
> + /* Transfer the charge and the css ref */
> commit_charge(new, memcg);
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(memcg, nr_pages);
> - memcg_check_events(memcg, folio_nid(new));
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + old->memcg_data = 0;
> }
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
>
Ah, I like this. Will send a fixlet based on this :)
I was scratching my head trying to figure out why we were
doing the double charging in the first place. Thanks for the context,
Johannes!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists