linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 10:30:19 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com,
        amiettinen@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid
 repeated SMP calls

On 29-09-23, 19:47, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28/09/23 12:35, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > 
> > 
> > On 01-09-23, 22:11, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > > @@ -131,19 +132,10 @@ static int tegra234_get_cpu_ndiv(u32 cpu, u32 cpuid, u32 clusterid, u64 *ndiv)
> > >   static void tegra234_set_cpu_ndiv(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u64 ndiv)
> > >   {
> > 
> > > +     for_each_cpu_and(cpu, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask)
> > 
> > (Yes this is existing code, but ..) you don't need to perform AND with
> > cpu_online_mask as policy->cpus should only contain currently online CPUs.
> > 
> > Please check if you ever see it differently.
> > 
> 
> I think this was kept to be safe.
> Should I removed the AND in v3 or send separate patch?

Sending it separately would be ideal.

-- 
viresh