linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] usb: ucsi: glink: use the connector orientation GPIO to provide switch events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:13:00 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] usb: ucsi: glink: use the connector orientation
 GPIO to provide switch events

On 02/10/2023 19:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 13:21, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On SM8550, the non-altmode orientation is not given anymore within
>> altmode events, even with USB SVIDs events.
>>
>> On the other side, the Type-C connector orientation is correctly
>> reported by a signal from the PMIC.
>>
>> Take this gpio signal when we detect some Type-C port activity
>> to notify any Type-C switches tied to the Type-C port connectors.
> 
> Have you checked, which UCSI version is implemented on SM8550?
> Is there any chance of GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS / bit 86 actually
> reflecting the correct orientation?

I checked, and no, the UCSI implementation is based on the UCSI 1.x spec,
and doesn't have the UCSI 2.x new bits.

Neil

> 
>>
>> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>> ---
> 
>