[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a30c60f0-1710-405a-bb18-813ce30d975b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:13:00 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] usb: ucsi: glink: use the connector orientation
GPIO to provide switch events
On 02/10/2023 19:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 13:21, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On SM8550, the non-altmode orientation is not given anymore within
>> altmode events, even with USB SVIDs events.
>>
>> On the other side, the Type-C connector orientation is correctly
>> reported by a signal from the PMIC.
>>
>> Take this gpio signal when we detect some Type-C port activity
>> to notify any Type-C switches tied to the Type-C port connectors.
>
> Have you checked, which UCSI version is implemented on SM8550?
> Is there any chance of GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS / bit 86 actually
> reflecting the correct orientation?
I checked, and no, the UCSI implementation is based on the UCSI 1.x spec,
and doesn't have the UCSI 2.x new bits.
Neil
>
>>
>> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>> ---
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists