| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA8EJppQizXAwN3gyWoyfDoAc6xGcZDrpDNemfXE_vrbp5yxnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:05:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/msm/dp: incorporate pm_runtime framework into
DP driver
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 01:48, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/27/2023 2:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 23:54, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >> Currently DP driver is executed independent of PM runtime framework.
> >> This lead to msm edp panel can not be detected by edp_panel driver at
> >> generic_edp_panel_probe() due to aux dpcd read failed at msm edp driver.
> > eDP, AUX, DPCD. leads. not being detected, s/at/during.
> >
> > Also there is no msm eDP driver.
> >
> >> Incorporating pm runtime framework into DP driver so that both power and
> > Incorporate. PM
> >
> >> clocks to enable/disable host controller fits with PM runtime mechanism.
> > Ugh?
> >
> >> Once pm runtime framework is incorporated into DP driver, wake up device
> > waking
> >
> >> from power up path is not necessary. Hence remove it.
> >> Since DP is part of user interface, we choice to use autosuspend feature
> >> with timer of one second. pm runtime suspends is prevented from happening
> >> until timer expired.
> > No, this is not the right reason to use autosuspend. Please use normal
> > suspend unless there is a performance regression caused by the
> > suspend/resume paths.
> >
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> -- reworded commit text to explain why pm_framework is required for edp panel
> >> -- reworded commit text to explain autosuspend is choiced
> >> -- delete EV_POWER_PM_GET and PM_EV_POWER_PUT from changes #3
> >> -- delete dp_display_pm_get() and dp_display_pm_Put() from changes #3
> >> -- return value from pm_runtime_resume_and_get() directly
> >> -- check return value of devm_pm_runtime_enable()
> >> -- delete pm_runtime_xxx from dp_display_remove()
> >> -- drop dp_display_host_init() from EV_HPD_INIT_SETUP
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> -- incorporate removing pm_runtime_xx() from dp_pwer.c to this patch
> >> -- use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get()
> >> -- error checking pm_runtime_resume_and_get() return value
> >> -- add EV_POWER_PM_GET and PM_EV_POWER_PUT to handle HPD_GPIO case
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c | 6 +++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c | 16 -------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.h | 11 -----
> >> 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >> index 8e3b677..22eb774 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
> >> @@ -291,6 +291,10 @@ static ssize_t dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux,
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dp_aux->dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> mutex_lock(&aux->mutex);
> >> if (!aux->initted) {
> >> ret = -EIO;
> >> @@ -364,6 +368,8 @@ static ssize_t dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *dp_aux,
> >>
> >> exit:
> >> mutex_unlock(&aux->mutex);
> >> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dp_aux->dev);
> >> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dp_aux->dev);
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> index 3ef141c..bfb4692 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> >> @@ -276,8 +276,6 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> >> dp->dp_display.drm_dev = drm;
> >> priv->dp[dp->id] = &dp->dp_display;
> >>
> >> -
> >> -
> > Is this also a part of pm_runtime support? No, it is not.
> >
> >> dp->drm_dev = drm;
> >> dp->aux->drm_dev = drm;
> >> rc = dp_aux_register(dp->aux);
> >> @@ -286,7 +284,6 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> >> goto end;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -
> > And this. If you want to clean up stray empty lines, please split that
> > to a separate patch.
> >
> >> rc = dp_register_audio_driver(dev, dp->audio);
> >> if (rc) {
> >> DRM_ERROR("Audio registration Dp failed\n");
> >> @@ -310,15 +307,10 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> >> struct dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
> >> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(master);
> >>
> >> - /* disable all HPD interrupts */
> >> - if (dp->core_initialized)
> >> - dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK, false);
> >> -
> >> kthread_stop(dp->ev_tsk);
> >>
> >> of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus(dp->aux);
> >>
> >> - dp_power_client_deinit(dp->power);
> >> dp_unregister_audio_driver(dev, dp->audio);
> >> dp_aux_unregister(dp->aux);
> >> dp->drm_dev = NULL;
> >> @@ -460,6 +452,16 @@ static void dp_display_host_deinit(struct dp_display_private *dp)
> >> static int dp_display_usbpd_configure_cb(struct device *dev)
> >> {
> >> struct dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (!dp->dp_display.internal_hpd) {
> > I'd say, drop the condition here.
> >
> >> + /* hpd through gpio */
> > Why? !internal_hpd means any possible way of delivering an HPD event.
> > For example, via the USB-C TCPM.
> >
> >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&dp->pdev->dev);
> > Which function contains corresponding pm_runtime_put()?
> >
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + DRM_ERROR("failed to start power\n");
> > failed to resume
> >
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >>
> >> dp_display_host_phy_init(dp);
> >>
> >> @@ -1086,7 +1088,6 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data)
> >>
> >> switch (todo->event_id) {
> >> case EV_HPD_INIT_SETUP:
> >> - dp_display_host_init(dp_priv);
> >> break;
> >> case EV_HPD_PLUG_INT:
> >> dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_priv, todo->data);
> >> @@ -1263,6 +1264,13 @@ static int dp_display_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &dp->dp_display);
> >>
> >> + rc = devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> >> + if (rc)
> >> + return rc;
> > Missing submodules deinit.
> >
> >> +
> >> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
> >> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> >> +
> >> rc = dp_display_request_irq(dp);
> >> if (rc)
> >> return rc;
> >> @@ -1285,6 +1293,34 @@ static int dp_display_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> >>
> >> + dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
> > There is already a call to dp_display_deinit_sub_modules() in
> > dp_display_remove().
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int dp_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
> >> +
> >> + if (dp->dp_display.is_edp) {
> >> + dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
> >> + dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_disable(dp->catalog);
> >> + }
> > I don't see where this code was removed.
>
> this code block is adapted from dp_pm_suspend().
>
> dp_pm_suspend() will be removed at "add
> pm_runtime_force_suspend()/resume()" patch.
Each patch should be atomic. Adding code here, while removing it
later, breaks that assumption.
>
> >
> >> + dp_display_host_deinit(dp);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int dp_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
> >> +
> >> + dp_display_host_init(dp);
> >> + if (dp->dp_display.is_edp) {
> >> + dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp->catalog);
> >> + dp_display_host_phy_init(dp);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1389,6 +1425,7 @@ static int dp_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static const struct dev_pm_ops dp_pm_ops = {
> >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dp_pm_runtime_suspend, dp_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> >> .suspend = dp_pm_suspend,
> >> .resume = dp_pm_resume,
> >> };
> >> @@ -1473,10 +1510,6 @@ static int dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct msm_dp *dp)
> >> aux_bus = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "aux-bus");
> >>
> >> if (aux_bus && dp->is_edp) {
> >> - dp_display_host_init(dp_priv);
> >> - dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp_priv->catalog);
> >> - dp_display_host_phy_init(dp_priv);
> >> -
> >> /*
> >> * The code below assumes that the panel will finish probing
> >> * by the time devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices() returns.
> >> @@ -1578,6 +1611,11 @@ void dp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> >> dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >> + if (pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&dp_display->pdev->dev)) {
> >> + DRM_ERROR("failed to start power\n");
> > failed to resume.
> >
> >> + mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> state = dp_display->hpd_state;
> >> if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_MAINLINK_READY) {
> >> @@ -1642,10 +1680,9 @@ void dp_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> >> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >>
> >> state = dp_display->hpd_state;
> >> - if (state != ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING && state != ST_CONNECTED) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >> - return;
> >> - }
> >> + if (state != ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING && state != ST_CONNECTED)
> >> + drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d wrong hpd_state=%d\n",
> >> + dp->connector_type, state);
> >>
> >> dp_display_disable(dp_display);
> >>
> >> @@ -1658,6 +1695,9 @@ void dp_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> >> }
> >>
> >> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d Done\n", dp->connector_type);
> >> +
> >> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&dp_display->pdev->dev);
> >> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&dp_display->pdev->dev);
> >> mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1697,6 +1737,12 @@ void dp_bridge_hpd_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >> struct dp_display_private *dp = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&dp->event_mutex);
> >> + if (pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&dp->pdev->dev)) {
> >> + DRM_ERROR("failed to start power\n");
> >> + mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp->catalog);
> >>
> >> /* enable HDP interrupts */
> >> @@ -1718,6 +1764,9 @@ void dp_bridge_hpd_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >> dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_disable(dp->catalog);
> >>
> >> dp_display->internal_hpd = false;
> >> +
> >> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&dp->pdev->dev);
> >> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&dp->pdev->dev);
> >> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1732,13 +1781,11 @@ void dp_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >> if (dp_display->internal_hpd)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> - if (!dp->core_initialized) {
> >> - drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "not initialized\n");
> >> - return;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (!dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_connected)
> >> + /* hpd through gpio */
> > Lack of the comment might be better than the incorrect comment.
> >
> >> + if (!dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_connected) {
> >> + dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
> > Is this also a part of pm_runtime support?
>
> yes, this is for hpd_internal == false case.
>
> The hpd_state need to be at init state.
Why do you have to add this line now, in this patch? What has changed
compared to the previous patch, which just added an event?
>
> >
> >> dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_PLUG_INT, 0, 0);
> >> - else if (dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_disconnected)
> >> + } else if (dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_disconnected) {
> >> dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 0);
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
> >> index 5cb84ca..863c766 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
> >> @@ -152,20 +152,9 @@ int dp_power_client_init(struct dp_power *dp_power)
> >>
> >> power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
> >>
> >> - pm_runtime_enable(power->dev);
> >> -
> >> return dp_power_clk_init(power);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void dp_power_client_deinit(struct dp_power *dp_power)
> >> -{
> >> - struct dp_power_private *power;
> >> -
> >> - power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
> >> -
> >> - pm_runtime_disable(power->dev);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> int dp_power_init(struct dp_power *dp_power)
> >> {
> >> int rc = 0;
> >> @@ -173,11 +162,7 @@ int dp_power_init(struct dp_power *dp_power)
> >>
> >> power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
> >>
> >> - pm_runtime_get_sync(power->dev);
> >> -
> >> rc = dp_power_clk_enable(dp_power, DP_CORE_PM, true);
> >> - if (rc)
> >> - pm_runtime_put_sync(power->dev);
> >>
> >> return rc;
> >> }
> >> @@ -189,7 +174,6 @@ int dp_power_deinit(struct dp_power *dp_power)
> >> power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
> >>
> >> dp_power_clk_enable(dp_power, DP_CORE_PM, false);
> >> - pm_runtime_put_sync(power->dev);
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.h
> >> index a3dec20..55ada51 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.h
> >> @@ -81,17 +81,6 @@ int dp_power_clk_enable(struct dp_power *power, enum dp_pm_type pm_type,
> >> int dp_power_client_init(struct dp_power *power);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> - * dp_power_clinet_deinit() - de-initialize clock and regulator modules
> >> - *
> >> - * @power: instance of power module
> >> - * return: 0 for success, error for failure.
> >> - *
> >> - * This API will de-initialize the DisplayPort's clocks and regulator
> >> - * modules.
> >> - */
> >> -void dp_power_client_deinit(struct dp_power *power);
> >> -
> >> -/**
> >> * dp_power_get() - configure and get the DisplayPort power module data
> >> *
> >> * @parser: instance of parser module
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists