[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231003082133.xyu46szs3jfm6fks@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:51:33 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add generic OPP support to the
SCMI performance domain
On 29-09-23, 17:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 03:17:15PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > To allow a consumer driver to use the OPP library to scale the performance
> > for its device, let's dynamically add the OPP table when the device gets
> > attached to its SCMI performance domain.
> >
>
> The SCMI changes(patches 7-9) look fine to me. Rafael was fine with genpd
> changes, Viresh if you are OK with OPP changes I can take it via SCMI as
> there are some dependent patches as Ulf has pointed out in the cover letter.
I would like to take OPP patches via my tree as there are some changes in my
tree and I plan to add some more changes on top of this. I can give an immutable
branch though.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists