[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa54a70c-e7fc-4ca2-9a4d-425675ed0be3@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:24:56 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Markus Meier <kerneldev@...c-bytes.net>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sven Frotscher <sven.frotscher@...il.com>,
August Wikerfors <git@...ustwikerfors.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: yc: Fix non-functional mic on Lenovo Yoga Slim
7 Pro 14ARH7 82UU
On 02.10.23 23:04, Markus Meier wrote:
>
> I own a Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7 where the microphone is not showing up.
> I added the system to the quirk table and the mic is working correctly (but
> with very low volume) now.
>
> Here's an except from dmidecode:
> System Information
> Manufacturer: LENOVO
> Product Name: 82UU
> Version: Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7
> SKU Number: LENOVO_MT_82UU_BU_idea_FM_Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7
> Family: Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH7
>
> Please add this patch to the kernel and add it to the stable kernels too. I
> guess the microphone should have worked before. Seems to be a regression
> introduced by c008323fe361bd62a43d9fb29737dacd5c067fb7
>
> [-- Attachment #2: yoga-slim-7-pro-82UU-microphone.patch --]
> [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 451 bytes --]
>
> --- a/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-mach.c 2023-09-29 19:31:03.753786095 +0200
> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-mach.c 2023-09-29 19:32:06.414276453 +0200
> @@ -217,6 +217,13 @@
> .driver_data = &acp6x_card,
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "82UU"),
> + }
> + },
> + {
> + .driver_data = &acp6x_card,
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "82V2"),
> }
> },
I CCed a bunch of lists and people to make sure everyone is aware of
that patch, as it otherwise might fall through the cracks.
Markus, quick question: do you have (a) an interest in contributing a
change to Linux or (b) did you just post this because Mario asked you to
do so in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217063#c25 ?
If it's (a) then you might want to take a closer look at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
, as your patch lacks a few important things before it can be applied
(most notably a Signed-off-by tag)
If it's (b) I wonder if it would be easier for everyone involved if some
kernel developer could create a patch own their own, as that likely is
way easier to review and thus likely gets the problem resolved a lot faster.
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists