linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/29] const xattr tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 15:28:45 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] const xattr tables

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 02:00:04AM -0300, Wedson Almeida Filho wrote:
> From: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>
> 
> The 's_xattr' field of 'struct super_block' currently requires a mutable
> table of 'struct xattr_handler' entries (although each handler itself is
> const). However, no code in vfs actually modifies the tables.
> 
> So this series changes the type of 's_xattr' to allow const tables, and
> modifies existing file system to move their tables to .rodata. This is
> desirable because these tables contain entries with function pointers in
> them; moving them to .rodata makes it considerably less likely to be
> modified accidentally or maliciously at runtime.

Fine by me and good idea. On vacation this week but I'll wait for
individual fs maintainers to ack their portions anyway and then pick up
next week.