linux-kernel - Re: [patch V3 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231003142347.GAZRwj83xsi80gW0OS@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:23:47 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse
 intel_cpu_collect_info()

On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Eew. That's a function exposed to code outside of microcode and just
> > grows that unused argument for no value and you obviously forgot to
> > fixup the extern callsite :)
> 
> It's used on AMD. Adding the below to the pile.

And now that I look at it again, exposing that "unused" arg is uglier
than having the local wrapper in the loader code. Yeah, lemme zap that.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette