linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the samsung-krzk tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:31:19 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "Olof Johansson" <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the samsung-krzk tree

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 08:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/09/2023 02:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The following commit is also in the arm-soc-fixes tree as a different
>> commit (but the same patch):
>> 
>>   471eed5ad217 ("arm64: defconfig: enable syscon-poweroff driver")
>> 
>> This is commit
>> 
>>   d75e870c32f6 ("arm64: defconfig: enable syscon-poweroff driver")
>> 
>> in the arm-soc-fixes tree.
>
> Hm, I did not expect this going through arm-soc, but no problem. I
> dropped it now from my tree.

Right, I was a little confused about why you sent the patch to
soc@...nel.org and had to guess between applying to fixes, to
the next branches or ignoring.

I should have asked you for confirmation here, but ended up
just merging it as it seemed harmless enough either way.

     Arnd