[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8OJY1S.X7HJ24U4D5AG2@ljones.dev>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:45:44 +0200
From: Luke Jones <luke@...nes.dev>
To: Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: 'Takashi Iwai' <tiwai@...e.de>, tiwai@...e.com,
james.schulman@...rus.com, david.rhodes@...rus.com,
rf@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Jonathan LoBue' <jlobue10@...il.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Support ASUS 2023 laptops with
missing DSD
On Thu, Aug 24 2023 at 08:31:06 AM +12:00:00, Luke Jones
<luke@...nes.dev> wrote:
>
>>
>> The second member variable in cs35l41_prop_model_table is the SSID to
>> match against.
>> The Lenovo laptops in the initial patch didn't have different SSIDs
>> so
>> the entry was set to NULL for those.
>> Future entries using CSC3551 MUST always have an accompanying SSID
>> with this entry.
>> Takashi was correct, the implementation is intended to also be used
>> to
>> patch incorrect DSD.
>>
>> We have a potential solution to workaround the SPI cs-gpios issue
>> inside here,
>> though the drawback for that is that it only works for laptops with 2
>> SPI amps.
>
> Can you provide me this so I can test? I have laptops with SPI 2 and
> 4 speaker setups.
Hi Stefan,
Do you have any further information about the status of this in regards
to the 2023 laptops?
>
>> I also took a look at the function for applying DSD properties for
>> the
>> 2023 ROG laptops.
>> Unfortunately the one-size-fits-all approach will not work, some of
>> these laptops are i2c
>> and some are SPI, meaning the GPIO indexes are different for
>> different
>> laptops.
>
> Do you mean "spk-id-gpios"? For all the laptops I know of this seems
> to be
> Package () { "spk-id-gpios", Package () {
> SPK1, 0x02, Zero, Zero,
> SPK1, 0x02, Zero, Zero
> } },
>
> There is one laptop where it is One not 0x02 (the GA402N)
>
>> Some of the laptops do no have Speaker IDs.
>> Also, no laptop other than the 2 I added already should ever use
>> CS35L41_EXT_BOOST_NO_VSPK_SWITCH (in fact I believe all these laptops
>> are internal
>> boost anyway).
>
> Grazie.
>
>>
>> We are currently working internally on adding support for the 2023
>> ROG
>> laptops, so we
>> ask for you guys to hold off on trying to upstream support for these
>> laptops.
>
> Ah great. Thank you. I apologise for trying to rush things, but I do
> have a discord server of over 4000 people, many of whom have laptops
> with cirrus amps.
>
> For now I'm including a patch in my kernel builds with this mapping:
>
> const struct cs35l41_prop_model cs35l41_prop_model_table[] = {
> { "CLSA0100", NULL, lenovo_legion_no_acpi },
> { "CLSA0101", NULL, lenovo_legion_no_acpi },
> { "CSC3551", "10431433", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GS650P -
> i2c
> { "CSC3551", "10431463", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GA402X -
> i2c
> { "CSC3551", "10431473", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GU604V -
> spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431483", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GU603V -
> spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431493", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GV601V -
> spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431573", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS GZ301V -
> spi
> { "CSC3551", "104317F3", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS ROG ALLY -
> i2c
> { "CSC3551", "10431B93", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G614J - spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431CAF", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G634J - spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431C9F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G614JI -spi
> { "CSC3551", "10431D1F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS G713P - i2c
> { "CSC3551", "10431F1F", asus_rog_2023_no_acpi }, // ASUS H7604JV -
> spi
> {}
> };
>
> These are the machines I have verified the gpios and such for.
I have a new version of this patch with all listed models confirmed as
working, and with slightly different settings for some. The only thing
missing in a solution to the gpio-cs issue.
Can you please provide an update on where you are with ASUS support in
particular so that I may consider if it is worth my time submitting the
updated patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Luke.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists