[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkdfg2ds.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 09:19:11 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, backports@...r.kernel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: add backporting and conflict resolution document
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> writes:
> This is a new document based on my 2022 blog post:
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/post/backporting-patches-using-git
>
> Although this is aimed at stable contributors and distro maintainers,
> it does also contain useful tips and tricks for anybody who needs to
> resolve merge conflicts.
>
> By adding this to the kernel as documentation we can more easily point
> to it e.g. from stable emails about failed backports, as well as allow
> the community to modify it over time if necessary.
>
> I've added this under process/ since it also has
> process/applying-patches.rst. Another interesting document is
> maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst which maybe should eventually refer
> to this one, but I'm leaving that as a future cleanup.
>
> Thanks to Harshit Mogalapalli for helping with the original blog post
> as well as this updated document and Bagas Sanjaya for providing
> thoughtful feedback.
>
> v2: fixed heading style, link style, placeholder style, other comments
So this seems generally good and useful. I have a few small comments,
none of which necessarily block merging it in its current form:
- I would like to see an ack/reviewed-by tag by others with experience
with this task if possible. The lack of complaints is a good start,
but not always indicative of a lack of disagreement...:)
- Might this be better placed in Documentation/maintainer?
- Colordiff looks cool, but I'd at least drop in a mention of the Emacs
ediff mode, which offers (I believe) a lot of the same functionality.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists