[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231004101942.11feab87@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:19:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Maher Sanalla <msanalla@...dia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@...el.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: mellanox: drop mlx5_cpumask_default_spread()
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:31:28 -0700 Yury Norov wrote:
> > We're half way thru the release cycle the conflicts can still come in.
> >
> > There's no dependency for the first patch. The most normal way to
> > handle this would be to send patch 1 to the networking tree and send
> > the rest in the subsequent merge window.
>
> Ah, I understand now. I didn't plan to move it in current merge
> window. In fact, I'll be more comfortable to keep it in -next for
> longer and merge it in v6.7.
>
> But it's up to you. If you think it's better, I can resend 1st patch
> separately.
Let's see if Saeed can help us.
Saeed, could you pick up patch 1 from this series for the mlx5 tree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists