linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: xen: ignore the VCPU_SSHOTTMR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8799ca02-61b2-46c4-855e-97d8a534d9e0@xen.org>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:43:28 +0100
From:   Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: xen: ignore the VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future flag

On 04/10/2023 18:34, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 17:11 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> nit: I think the commit title should probably be 'KVM: x86:' and then
>> mention Xen somewhere in the rest of the line?
> 
> I would also be ok if we start doing "KVM: x86/xen:", because it seems like y'all
> are sending enough Xen specific changes that differentiating would be useful.

Ok, I'll send a v2 with an amended subject line.

   Paul