[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231004184044.3062788-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 11:40:43 -0700
From: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com, tinghao.zhang@...el.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 6/7] perf header: Support num and width of branch counters
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To support the branch counters feature, the information of the maximum
number of supported counters and the width of the counters is exposed
in the sysfs caps folder. The perf tool can use the information to parse
the logged counters in each branch.
Store the information in the perf_env for later usage.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---
New patch
tools/perf/util/env.h | 5 +++++
tools/perf/util/header.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h
index 4566c51f2fd9..48d7f8759a2a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/env.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct hybrid_node {
struct pmu_caps {
int nr_caps;
unsigned int max_branches;
+ unsigned int br_cntr_nr;
+ unsigned int br_cntr_width;
+
char **caps;
char *pmu_name;
};
@@ -62,6 +65,8 @@ struct perf_env {
unsigned long long total_mem;
unsigned int msr_pmu_type;
unsigned int max_branches;
+ unsigned int br_cntr_nr;
+ unsigned int br_cntr_width;
int kernel_is_64_bit;
int nr_cmdline;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index d812e1e371a7..9664062ba835 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -3256,7 +3256,9 @@ static int process_compressed(struct feat_fd *ff,
}
static int __process_pmu_caps(struct feat_fd *ff, int *nr_caps,
- char ***caps, unsigned int *max_branches)
+ char ***caps, unsigned int *max_branches,
+ unsigned int *br_cntr_nr,
+ unsigned int *br_cntr_width)
{
char *name, *value, *ptr;
u32 nr_pmu_caps, i;
@@ -3291,6 +3293,12 @@ static int __process_pmu_caps(struct feat_fd *ff, int *nr_caps,
if (!strcmp(name, "branches"))
*max_branches = atoi(value);
+ if (!strcmp(name, "branch_counter_nr"))
+ *br_cntr_nr = atoi(value);
+
+ if (!strcmp(name, "branch_counter_width"))
+ *br_cntr_width = atoi(value);
+
free(value);
free(name);
}
@@ -3315,7 +3323,9 @@ static int process_cpu_pmu_caps(struct feat_fd *ff,
{
int ret = __process_pmu_caps(ff, &ff->ph->env.nr_cpu_pmu_caps,
&ff->ph->env.cpu_pmu_caps,
- &ff->ph->env.max_branches);
+ &ff->ph->env.max_branches,
+ &ff->ph->env.br_cntr_nr,
+ &ff->ph->env.br_cntr_width);
if (!ret && !ff->ph->env.cpu_pmu_caps)
pr_debug("cpu pmu capabilities not available\n");
@@ -3344,7 +3354,9 @@ static int process_pmu_caps(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
ret = __process_pmu_caps(ff, &pmu_caps[i].nr_caps,
&pmu_caps[i].caps,
- &pmu_caps[i].max_branches);
+ &pmu_caps[i].max_branches,
+ &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_nr,
+ &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_width);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists